One point of view from cable TV - Blind Date

Posted by dating

July 9, 2008

Channel 13-channel television at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile-began to pass a new reality show, always at the forefront (and all for the rating) this channel has raided in excerpts on television. The program is called “Blind Love” and in it, a woman of 23 years, “she super well” looking for a man among a group of more than 15, all of whom graced very little physically, and what more baboso, by beseech be elected by this kind of princess.

The music program is quite sticky, it must be said.

As for the program itself, we must also say a few things, the first is that any man who is held in such can only give shame to see a couple of others begging for an “opportunity” and not move away from the little girl . This denostar dignity of man.

On the other hand, and now from a perspective bioethics, it is also necessary to say that in general the reality shows are experiments with humans in artificial environments that parallel to humans in laboratory rats, of course, because all the scenarios are fictitious, and Chambers also make sobreactuar to people, brands sponsoring require participants to be supporters of them, and so on.

In the case of “Blind Date” the issue is particularly rude, because it is not the worldly struggle to get an appointment is in this way, moreover, the program generated bonds of friendship between men that are more specific to women (if anyone interpreted this comment as a habit of machismo, probably does not understand much of human relationships and I are misinterpreting), in the words clearer, choppy phrases on the agenda between men such as: “pucha, I do not want you vayai you prefer to be fulano… “, etc..

Without wishing to be sexist, exist in the world today: Men, Lesbians and Gays, each in its own space, each with characteristics more or less defined. The issue is that “Blind Date” does act Men involved in a Woman with attitudes Gays, and the point is that there is nothing against them, but the programme had indicated that in principle consisted of a struggle between an appointment a man and a woman, but in the end, becomes an experiment in how to operate Men who are fighting for a Woman when they are locked up for several days, and some will have to withdraw, and have cameras in front, so you try to act as correct as possible, or as irreverent as possible, and so on. to draw the attention of Women, but also of all viewers, putting these men in a constant stress (Will means that the idea is not to attack homosexuals, but each is consistent with their “sexual speech “?).

This program violates human dignity, despite the fact that participants are provided with their willingness to do so, because today is that willingness confused, yet there are no clear criteria for defining public if it is good or bad experience with humans.

There is a struggle between Science and Faith: Science wager on experimentation, without looking to ethics; Faith, by contrast prefers to ethics Experimentation.

We can not solve today who is right, probably either keep, but who are on the side of the FE, can not preach in favour of bioethics with one hand and experiment with humans irresponsibly with the other.